Review




Structured Review

GenScript corporation optimized gfp gene, superfolder gfp
Optimized Gfp Gene, Superfolder Gfp, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+gene%2C+superfolder+gfp/us10724070-56-5-15?v=GenScript+corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
optimized gfp gene, superfolder gfp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

86
Sangon Biotech gene fragments encoding superfolder green fluorescent protein
Gene Fragments Encoding Superfolder Green Fluorescent Protein, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+gene%2C+superfolder+gfp/pm41571921-73-23-53?v=Sangon+Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene fragments encoding superfolder green fluorescent protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc superfolder green fluorescent protein sfgfp gene
Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for <t>fluorescent</t> reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d <t>sfGFP-only</t> vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.
Superfolder Green Fluorescent Protein Sfgfp Gene, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+gene%2C+superfolder+gfp/pmc12848028-344-16-25?v=Addgene+inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
superfolder green fluorescent protein sfgfp gene - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Rocha labs monomeric superfolder msf gfp gene
Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for <t>fluorescent</t> reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d <t>sfGFP-only</t> vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.
Monomeric Superfolder Msf Gfp Gene, supplied by Rocha labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+gene%2C+superfolder+gfp/pmc08449657-177-7-27?v=Rocha+labs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monomeric superfolder msf gfp gene - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher superfolder-gfp (sfgfp) gene
Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for <t>fluorescent</t> reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d <t>sfGFP-only</t> vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.
Superfolder Gfp (Sfgfp) Gene, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+gene%2C+superfolder+gfp/pm33263222-263-1-9?v=Thermo+Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
superfolder-gfp (sfgfp) gene - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GenScript corporation optimized gfp gene, superfolder gfp
Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for <t>fluorescent</t> reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d <t>sfGFP-only</t> vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.
Optimized Gfp Gene, Superfolder Gfp, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+gene%2C+superfolder+gfp/us10724070-56-5-15?v=GenScript+corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
optimized gfp gene, superfolder gfp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GenScript corporation gfp gene, superfolder gfp
Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for <t>fluorescent</t> reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d <t>sfGFP-only</t> vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.
Gfp Gene, Superfolder Gfp, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+gene%2C+superfolder+gfp/us10724070-132-8-18?v=GenScript+corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gfp gene, superfolder gfp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc gene encoding superfolder gfp sfgfp
Fig. 6. High-throughput CBD purification results. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of the CI-bGal purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 116 kDa bGal protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of the <t>CI-sfGFP</t> purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 27 kDa sfGFP protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. (C) Individual well yields for one of the CI-bGal purification plates. Well yields range from ~13 to 19 mg. (D) Individual well yields for one of the CI-sfGFP purification plates. Well yields range from ~15 to 25 mg. (E) Heat map for one of the CI-bGal purification plates. There are no apparent patterns in the yields. Wells H1 and H7 (from the same expression well) were taken as outliers (>3s) due to no induction. (F) Heat map for one of the CI-sfGFP purification plates.
Gene Encoding Superfolder Gfp Sfgfp, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+gene%2C+superfolder+gfp/pm27771392-51-8-19?v=Addgene+inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene encoding superfolder gfp sfgfp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sandia Biotech superfolder (sf) gfp gene
Fig. 6. High-throughput CBD purification results. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of the CI-bGal purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 116 kDa bGal protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of the <t>CI-sfGFP</t> purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 27 kDa sfGFP protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. (C) Individual well yields for one of the CI-bGal purification plates. Well yields range from ~13 to 19 mg. (D) Individual well yields for one of the CI-sfGFP purification plates. Well yields range from ~15 to 25 mg. (E) Heat map for one of the CI-bGal purification plates. There are no apparent patterns in the yields. Wells H1 and H7 (from the same expression well) were taken as outliers (>3s) due to no induction. (F) Heat map for one of the CI-sfGFP purification plates.
Superfolder (Sf) Gfp Gene, supplied by Sandia Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+gene%2C+superfolder+gfp/pmc04569737__ncomms9163___s1-108-1-13?v=Sandia+Biotech
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
superfolder (sf) gfp gene - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for fluorescent reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d sfGFP-only vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Temporal gene regulation enables controlled expression of gas vesicles and preserves bacterial viability

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67667-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for fluorescent reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d sfGFP-only vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.

Article Snippet: The monomeric Cherry red fluorescent protein (mCherry) gene was obtained from Addgene (plasmid #29747), and the superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) gene was acquired from Addgene (plasmid #85492).

Techniques: Construct, Expressing, Fluorescence, Concentration Assay, Two Tailed Test

Fig. 6. High-throughput CBD purification results. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of the CI-bGal purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 116 kDa bGal protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of the CI-sfGFP purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 27 kDa sfGFP protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. (C) Individual well yields for one of the CI-bGal purification plates. Well yields range from ~13 to 19 mg. (D) Individual well yields for one of the CI-sfGFP purification plates. Well yields range from ~15 to 25 mg. (E) Heat map for one of the CI-bGal purification plates. There are no apparent patterns in the yields. Wells H1 and H7 (from the same expression well) were taken as outliers (>3s) due to no induction. (F) Heat map for one of the CI-sfGFP purification plates.

Journal: Analytical biochemistry

Article Title: High-throughput purification of recombinant proteins using self-cleaving intein tags.

doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.10.016

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 6. High-throughput CBD purification results. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of the CI-bGal purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 116 kDa bGal protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of the CI-sfGFP purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 27 kDa sfGFP protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. (C) Individual well yields for one of the CI-bGal purification plates. Well yields range from ~13 to 19 mg. (D) Individual well yields for one of the CI-sfGFP purification plates. Well yields range from ~15 to 25 mg. (E) Heat map for one of the CI-bGal purification plates. There are no apparent patterns in the yields. Wells H1 and H7 (from the same expression well) were taken as outliers (>3s) due to no induction. (F) Heat map for one of the CI-sfGFP purification plates.

Article Snippet: For the expression of GFP fusion proteins, the gene encoding superfolder GFP (sfGFP) was amplified from the vector pET/sfGFP-LIC (Addgene plasmid 29772) using primers; F 50-AT CGT GTA CAC AAC ATG CAG GGT ATG GTG AGC AAG GGC GAG GAG-30 and R 50-GTA CAA GCT TGC CTG CAG TTA CTA CTT ATA CAG CTC GTC CAT G-3’.

Techniques: High Throughput Screening Assay, SDS Page, Expressing

Fig. 7. Fig. 6: High-throughput ELP purification results. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of the EI-bGal purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 116 kDa bGal protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of the EI-sfGFP purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 27 kDa sfGFP protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. The sfGFP samples run as doublets on SDS-PAGE when constituted in the ELP elution buffer, for unknown reasons. (C) Individual well yields for one of the EI-bGal purification plates. Well yields range from ~10e14.5 mg. (D) Individual well yields for one of the EI-sfGFP purification plates. Well yields range from ~7 to 14 mg. (E) Heat map for one of the EI-bGal purification plates. There are no apparent patterns in the yields. (F) Heat map for one of the EI-sfGFP purification plates. Well D12 was taken as an outlier (>3s).

Journal: Analytical biochemistry

Article Title: High-throughput purification of recombinant proteins using self-cleaving intein tags.

doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.10.016

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 7. Fig. 6: High-throughput ELP purification results. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of the EI-bGal purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 116 kDa bGal protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of the EI-sfGFP purification. The purified product from 12 wells was randomly selected for analysis. The elution profile of the 27 kDa sfGFP protein was very similar for all 12 samples, and the purity was >90% for each. The sfGFP samples run as doublets on SDS-PAGE when constituted in the ELP elution buffer, for unknown reasons. (C) Individual well yields for one of the EI-bGal purification plates. Well yields range from ~10e14.5 mg. (D) Individual well yields for one of the EI-sfGFP purification plates. Well yields range from ~7 to 14 mg. (E) Heat map for one of the EI-bGal purification plates. There are no apparent patterns in the yields. (F) Heat map for one of the EI-sfGFP purification plates. Well D12 was taken as an outlier (>3s).

Article Snippet: For the expression of GFP fusion proteins, the gene encoding superfolder GFP (sfGFP) was amplified from the vector pET/sfGFP-LIC (Addgene plasmid 29772) using primers; F 50-AT CGT GTA CAC AAC ATG CAG GGT ATG GTG AGC AAG GGC GAG GAG-30 and R 50-GTA CAA GCT TGC CTG CAG TTA CTA CTT ATA CAG CTC GTC CAT G-3’.

Techniques: High Throughput Screening Assay, SDS Page